<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>yodelingtheresa.com &#187; Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yodelingtheresa.com/tag/copyright/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yodelingtheresa.com</link>
	<description>Music You Can Yodel Along To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Royalties Ruling Changes Copyright Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.yodelingtheresa.com/royalties-ruling-changes-copyright-laws-16</link>
		<comments>http://www.yodelingtheresa.com/royalties-ruling-changes-copyright-laws-16#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodelingtheresa.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man has won the future writes of a song 40 years after it was written, The current law states all cases must be brought within 6 years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">A decision was made in court recently in London which could open the flood gates for people muscling in on royalties received from music. The song in question was &#8216;Whiter Shade Of Pale&#8217; performed by Procol Harum and written by Gary Brooker. Well that&#8217;s what he thought, He has been collecting the royalties from one of the most played songs in history for the last 40 years. Now he has to hand over 40% of all future earnings to Matthew Fisher who co wrote the song.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Now Ive started this as though Mr Fisher is a bad guy and Mr Brooker shouldnt have to hand anything over, In reality, i think it should have been sorted out originally so it never got to this point. However; Mt Fisher has now won a landmark case in the courts were he has won the right to collect 40% of the future royalties of the song.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">This might not sound like much but the re is one key factor in the case. By law anyone with a case to bring to court has to do so within 6 years of the original incident happening, the only change to this is for a personal injury claim. However this song was wrote 40 years ago which i don&#8217;t need to tell you; is a lot longer than 6 years!! This case now opens the door for people to make claims on music they have help write but have never had a say on the royalties, This case has shown that the law surrounding royalties does not apply the 6 year rule that all other cases hold. We now watch and wait and see who comes out of the woodwork! That gets me thinking; am old enough to have feasibly wrote the Beatles catalogue?!</div>
<p>A decision was made in court recently in London which could open the flood gates for people muscling in on royalties received from music. The song in question was &#8216;Whiter Shade Of Pale&#8217; performed by Procol Harum and written by Gary Brooker. Well that&#8217;s what he thought, He has been collecting the royalties from one of the most played songs in history for the last 40 years. Now he has to hand over 40% of all future earnings to Matthew Fisher who co wrote the song.</p>
<p>Now Ive started this as though Mr Fisher is a bad guy and Mr Brooker shouldnt have to hand anything over, In reality, i think it should have been sorted out originally so it never got to this point. However; Mt Fisher has now won a landmark case in the courts were he has won the right to collect 40% of the future royalties of the song.</p>
<p>ll This might not sound like much but the re is one key factor in the case. By law anyone with a case to bring to court has to do so within 6 years of the original incident happening, the only change to this is for a personal injury claim. However this song was wrote 40 years ago which i don&#8217;t need to tell you; is a lot longer than 6 years!! This case now opens the door for people to make claims on music they have help write but have never had a say on the royalties, This case has shown that the law surrounding royalties does not apply the 6 year rule that all other cases hold. We now watch and wait and see who comes out of the woodwork! That gets me thinking; am old enough to have feasibly wrote the Beatles catalogue?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yodelingtheresa.com/royalties-ruling-changes-copyright-laws-16/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
